Connect AI Tools to Raw Research Data and Save Results to Condens with MCP
In our survey of 332 research practitioners, 73% said they use general-purpose AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini in their analysis work. Their most common frustration was AI output that feels generic or loses important context. An AI tool can only work with what it's given, and a single pasted transcript leaves out most of what a research team knows.
What makes AI useful for research is what it can draw on: the Sessions behind a finding, who said what and in which setting, and everything your team has learned before. That lives in your research repository. The Condens MCP Server now gives AI tools and agents access to your raw research data and lets them write results back to your research repository, so they work from the evidence your team has built and leave something behind for whoever asks next.
Let's dive into this product update!
- The best of your AI tools and your repository, together
- What the Condens MCP Server can read and write
- Take cross-study analysis and meta studies further
- Bring research into the rest of your work
- Put research to work in agents and automated workflows
- Turn AI analysis into shared evidence
- Keep living reports up to date
- Stay in control of what AI can see and change
- Prompts to try
- Getting started
The best of your AI tools and your repository, together
Many researchers and product teams like to work in Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot, right next to everything else on their plate. What those tools produce depends on what they're given. As Condens CEO Alexander Knoll often puts it, AI-supported insights are only as good as the context they draw from: the problem behind what people said, the metadata around it, and what your organization already knows.
A transcript pasted into a chat carries none of that. The answer can sound right and still miss what matters, and the work stays in one person’s chat history, with no link back to the participant.
A research repository holds those layers. With the Condens MCP Server, your AI tools work from all of it and save what they produce back to Condens. You work in the tool that fits the moment, while Condens keeps the evidence and the structure behind it.
What the Condens MCP Server can read and write
The Condens MCP Server lets AI tools and agents like Claude, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot Studio and company LLMs read your Sessions, Transcripts and unpublished Artifacts, create Highlights and Notes, and update existing Artifacts in Condens. Admins decide which of these abilities each connection gets. Every ability is its own permission, so you turn on exactly what fits your team.
Ability | What your AI tool can do | Permission |
|---|---|---|
Read published Artifacts | Read insights and reports published to your Magazine and in Projects you can access | Read published Artifacts |
Read unpublished Artifacts | Read drafts and other Artifacts in your Projects, including Highlights with their full text and Tags, charts and clusters | Read Artifacts in Projects |
Read raw research data | Read Projects and Sessions, including transcripts, notes and Session information fields | Read Projects and Sessions |
Look up participants | Read participant profiles from your Participant pool | Read Participant data |
Create Highlights | Create Highlights in Sessions and assign your existing Tags | Create Highlights & assign Tags |
Create Notes | Create unpublished Notes with supporting Highlights, Artifacts and clusters embedded | Create Artifacts |
Update Artifacts | Edit existing Artifacts you can edit in Condens, except Whiteboards | Update Artifacts |
A connection that reads published Artifacts only is still the right setup for many teams. Stakeholders get curated, reviewed findings, and work in progress stays with the research team. Raw data and write access build on that for the people who work closest to the data, like researchers, ReOps and contributors on product teams. On Enterprise, permission sets let you offer each of these groups its own level of access through the same connection.
Take cross-study analysis and meta studies further
The questions that matter most rarely fit inside one study. With raw data access, your AI tool can read the Sessions, transcripts and Session information in every Project you have access to, together with Artifacts that aren't published yet. That makes cross-study work something you can do on a normal timeline, across years of research and next to your other data.
See everything you know about a persona or segment
A research team runs several studies a year, and the same personas show up in most of them. Ask your AI tool to bring together what solo travelers, hospital physicians or first-time buyers said across all of them, filtered by the participant and Session information you already keep in Condens. You see how their needs have changed over time, with every quote linked to the Session it came from, and new findings can be checked against everything you already know about that group.
Answer the "what have we learned over the years" question
When a stakeholder asks for everything your team has learned about a topic over the past three years, the answer is a meta study. Condens teams have long run these by pulling evidence from past Projects into a new one. Your AI tool can now do the first pass of gathering: it searches across Projects, groups the evidence by the criteria you give it, and creates a Note in Condens with the supporting Highlights embedded. You review it, add your interpretation and publish it.
Triangulate research with numbers from other tools
Leadership often asks how many users a finding affects. Your AI tool can bring survey results and NPS scores stored as Session information in Condens together with data from analytics or support tools it's connected to, and show where what users say lines up with what they do. The qualitative evidence stays linked to its source, and the numbers come from the tools built for them.
Start new studies from what's already known
Before planning a new study, ask your AI tool what past Sessions already say about the topic, with quotes and the Sessions they come from. You start from what your team has learned and focus the new study on the open questions.

Ask for the Session behind each point. Your AI tool can point you to the source, so you can check the context before a quote ends up in a deck.
Bring research into the rest of your work
Research is rarely used on its own. A product decision also depends on the roadmap, the backlog, analytics and what sales and support are hearing. The Condens MCP Server works with any MCP-compatible AI tool, so your research can sit next to those sources in the same conversation, with Condens as one of the inputs.
Think of the last product decision you helped with. The roadmap is in Notion, the tickets are in Jira, the numbers are in an analytics dashboard, and the research is in Condens. Inside Condens, AI search is the quickest way to answer a research question. When the question spans research and everything else, being able to ask in the tool you already have open makes a real difference. You stay in your flow, follow-up questions build on the same conversation, and the draft you end up with already has the evidence in it.
The same goes for stakeholders. A product lead who lives in Copilot or a company LLM can get evidence-backed answers there, from exactly the research you've made available to them.
That includes the tools enterprise teams standardize on: Microsoft Copilot Studio, Glean, a company LLM, design tools like Figma Make and coding assistants like Cursor or Claude Code. Research shows up where each team already works, with the same permissions behind it.
Check a brief against past research
Before writing a product brief, a PM asks their AI tool what research already exists on the topic, then drafts the brief with the relevant quotes and Highlights in front of them. Nobody has to remember that a study from two quarters ago already covered it.
Connect findings to the backlog
Ask your AI tool to compare open Jira tickets with what users said about the same features in recent Sessions. You see which tickets have evidence behind them, and which ones could use a closer look before they go into the sprint.
Design and build with the evidence at hand
A designer in Figma Make pulls usability findings about the current flow into the prompt before generating a new version. A developer in Cursor checks what users struggled with in a feature before changing it.
Put research to work in agents and automated workflows
The Condens MCP Server also works with agent platforms like n8n, Microsoft Copilot Studio and company LLMs, so research can become part of workflows that run without someone starting each conversation. Agents use the same tools and permissions as everyone else: they read what the connection allows, and can write Highlights, Notes and updates back to Condens.
A few workflows teams are setting up or exploring:
A weekly research digest: An agent reads the Sessions added in the past week, summarizes what came up by Tag, and shares the summary with your team, with links back to Condens.
Research combined with product data: An agent pulls findings from Condens together with behavioral analytics and support tickets, and flags where what users say and what they do point in the same direction.
Stakeholder questions answered where they're asked: A Copilot Studio agent or company LLM answers questions like "what do we know about onboarding?" from your published Artifacts, with links back to Condens, so stakeholders get evidence-backed answers in the tools they already use.
Findings pulled out of existing reports: An agent goes through older reports and creates Notes for the individual findings, each with its supporting Highlights embedded, so they're easier to search and reuse.
A research check before new work: Whenever a new study or epic is created, an agent looks for related research in Condens and adds the links, so nobody starts from zero.
For workflows that write to Condens without someone confirming each step, permissions matter even more. A dedicated MCP client with only the abilities that workflow needs keeps it focused, and new Notes still arrive unpublished for a person to review.
Turn AI analysis into shared evidence
The Condens MCP Server can write results back to your repository as Highlights and Notes, so analysis done in an AI tool becomes something the whole team can find and build on.
Tag Sessions with your existing Tags
Ask your AI tool to go through a Session and create Highlights for what matters, and it uses the Tags your team already works with. It doesn't create new Tags, so your taxonomy stays the way you set it up. If a matching Highlight already exists, it adds the new Tags to that one instead of creating a duplicate. On supported tools, the Tag Session in Condens prompt guides it through a complete Session.
Write up findings with the evidence built in
When it's time to share, your AI tool can create a Note in Condens with the supporting Highlights embedded. Every point in the Note leads back to the moment in the Session it came from, so a stakeholder can open the original quote or clip instead of taking a summary on faith. Notes are created unpublished, and you publish them in Condens when they're ready.
Get a second pair of eyes on your analysis
Some researchers tag a Session themselves first, then ask their AI tool what they might have missed. It works like a quick review from a teammate: the final call stays with you, and anything worth keeping goes into Condens as a Highlight.

Say where the result should go, for example "save these as Highlights in Condens" or "create a Note in Condens." Some AI tools have their own artifacts, and naming Condens makes sure the work lands in your repository.
Keep living reports up to date
The Condens MCP Server can update existing Artifacts, so your AI tool can add new findings to a report, rewrite a section or tighten a summary directly in Condens. It works for any Artifact you can edit, except Whiteboards.
This matters most for the reports people keep coming back to: a persona overview, an onboarding report, a running list of usability issues. When two new Sessions come in, you can ask your AI tool to add what's new to the report with the supporting Highlights embedded, and the report stays current without a full rewrite. Comments on the content it changes are kept, so the discussion around a finding stays with it.
Edits are saved right away, including in published Artifacts, so a published report reflects the change as soon as it's made. Your AI tool is instructed to only edit when you ask for it or approve it, and tools like Claude and ChatGPT usually ask you to confirm before an edit runs.
A few things stay in Condens for now. Your AI tool can replace or remove images, files, embeds and charts, but it can't add new ones.
Stay in control of what AI can see and change
Giving an AI tool access to raw research raises fair questions. Who can see participant data? Could it change a report nobody meant to touch? The Condens MCP Server is set up so you can answer those questions before anyone connects.
It follows your existing access: The MCP never shows anyone something they couldn't already see in Condens. Viewers can read published Artifacts, and raw data is available to people with a contributor seat.
Every ability is its own permission: Reading raw data, creating Highlights, creating Notes and updating Artifacts are turned on separately, so a connection set up for reading never starts writing by itself.
Different teams can get different access: On Enterprise, permission sets let Admins give researchers raw data and write access while stakeholders read published Artifacts only.
Your privacy settings carry through: Speaker names follow each Artifact's publishing settings, redactions stay redacted, and participant data only appears when the connection has permission to read it.
You stay in the loop on every change: Your AI tool is instructed to check with you before it saves Highlights or edits an Artifact, and Notes stay unpublished until you publish them in Condens.
Permission sets for different teams (Enterprise)
On the Enterprise plan, Admins can set up permission sets for each MCP client, so different teams get the access that fits their work through the same AI tool. A permission set defines who it applies to, by user, role or user group, which workspaces it covers, and what the connection can read and write. For example, the research team can work with raw data and create Highlights and Notes, product managers can read unpublished Artifacts, and the wider organization reads published Artifacts only. Existing MCP clients keep their current access as a single permission set until you change it.
For ReOps and research leads, this means you can say yes to AI tools without giving up governance. You decide how far each connection goes, and you can change it at any time in Condens.
Prompts to try
The easiest way to start is to paste a Condens link into your AI tool and ask it to work with it. The prompts below give your AI tool clear criteria first, so you get evidence you can check before anything is interpreted or saved.
Who | Goal | Prompt |
|---|---|---|
UX researchers | Tag a Session | "Go through this Session and create Highlights in Condens for every mention of exports. Use our existing Tags and show me the list before saving: [Session link]" |
Pull exact quotes | "List every passage in this Session where the participant describes a workaround. Quote them word for word, without summarizing: [Session link]" | |
Check for gaps | "I've tagged this Session already. Compare my Highlights with the transcript and list passages about onboarding I haven't tagged yet: [Session link]" | |
Write up a Note | "Group the Highlights tagged Onboarding in this Project by the step of the flow they refer to. Then create a Note in Condens with one section per step and the Highlights embedded." | |
Summarize a Session | "Summarize this Session in the order topics came up. Keep the participant's own wording and don't add conclusions: [Session link]" | |
Research leads and ReOps | Find quotes across studies | "Find every quote about pricing across our Projects, grouped by study, and name the Session each one comes from." |
Revisit an older report | "This report was published in March. Check which of its findings came up again in Sessions since then, and list the new evidence for each: [Artifact link]" | |
Update a living report | "Add the findings from these two new Sessions to our onboarding report in Condens as a new section, with the Highlights embedded. Show me the change before you save it: [Artifact link]" | |
Product managers | Prepare a brief | "Before I write this brief, what has our research found about bulk editing? Include quotes and the Sessions they're from." |
Check the backlog | "Compare these Jira tickets with what users said in recent Sessions. Which ones have evidence behind them?" | |
Track feedback over time | "Find what users said about notifications in the last six months and quote them directly. Keep feature requests and complaints in separate lists." | |
Designers | Review a flow | "What did participants struggle with in the current checkout flow? Include notes from Sessions that weren't written up." |
Group usability issues | "Find usability test quotes about the mobile navigation and group them by issue." | |
Agents and workflows | Weekly digest | "Every Monday, read the Sessions added to Condens in the past week, list the Tags that came up most often, and quote two Highlights for each." |
Research check on new epics | "When a new epic is created in Jira, search Condens for Sessions and Artifacts on the same topic and add the links to the epic." |
Getting started
Research has always been most valuable when it builds up over time. AI tools make it faster to work with, and a structured repository makes sure that work doesn't scatter. With raw data access and write access, the Condens MCP Server brings the two together, so every question your team works through in an AI tool can add to what your repository knows. Condens' own AI features stay right next to your data, for whenever you'd rather work inside Condens.
To set it up, an Admin turns on the permissions you want for each MCP client in Settings > Account > API & MCP-Server. If you're already connected, refresh the connection in your AI tool to pick up the new tools. You'll find step-by-step guides in our Help Center, and if you have questions, reach out at hello@condens.io!
FAQ
-
The Condens MCP Server connects your Condens research repository to AI tools that support the Model Context Protocol (MCP), like Claude, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot Studio, Cursor or a company LLM. Depending on the permissions an Admin sets, those tools can read your research and save their work back to Condens.
-
Yes, with the Read Projects and Sessions permission, Claude, ChatGPT and other connected AI tools can read the transcripts, notes and Session information in the Projects you have access to in Condens.
-
No, an AI tool connected through the Condens MCP Server only sees what the connected user can already see in Condens, and only what the MCP client's permissions allow. Admins can limit a connection to published Artifacts only.
-
Yes, with the Create Highlights & assign Tags permission, your AI tool can create Highlights in Sessions and assign your existing Tags. It can't create new Tags, and it reuses a matching Highlight instead of creating a duplicate.
-
Yes, with the Update Artifacts permission, your AI tool can edit existing Artifacts you can edit, including published ones, except Whiteboards. Edits are saved right away, so the AI tool is instructed to only change an Artifact when you ask for it or approve it.
-
When you paste transcripts into a chat, the AI works with a copy and the results stay in that conversation. Through the Condens MCP Server, the AI works with your repository's structure, can point to the Session behind each answer, and can save Highlights and Notes back to Condens for your whole team.
-
Ask your AI tool to quote the evidence and name the Session behind each point, then check the context in Condens. Notes created through the MCP embed the supporting Highlights, so every claim can be traced back to its source.
-
Participant profiles are only shared when the MCP client has the Read Participant data permission. Speaker names follow each Artifact's publishing settings, and redactions applied in Condens carry through to the AI tool.
-
Claude and ChatGPT come pre-configured in Condens. You can also connect custom MCP clients like Microsoft Copilot Studio, n8n, Glean, Figma Make, Claude Code, VS Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI or a company LLM.
-
Yes, agent platforms like n8n, Microsoft Copilot Studio or a company LLM can connect to Condens as a custom MCP client. Agents can then read research and write Highlights, Notes and updates back to Condens, within the permissions set for that client.


